← runs

Measure Twice

2026-04-28/732670d724fa/02 · iteration 2

Composite scores how is this calculated?

Text: 9.00 · Audio: 8.10 · Rules: 9/10

Text axes

form_as_finite_generator 9
long_fuse_plotting 10
status_as_live_wire 10
genre_register_collision 8
tonal_duality 10
structural_reveal 9
politeness_as_masking 10

Audio axes

character_distinctness 9
delivery_match 8
pacing 7
prosody_variation 8
consistency_across_episode 8

Audio

audio not committed to repo

WPM: 99 · WER: 0.00 · seams: 4 · distinctness: marginal (Δ 12 Hz)

Script statistics

95 lines · 629 words · 6.62 avg words/line (corpus 8–14)

2 characters · 1 minor (<5% of lines) · lead/second ratio 1.09 (balanced)

characterlineswordsline %word %avg w/l
Arthur ★ lead 49 348 51.6% 55.3% 7.1
Thomas 2nd 45 276 47.4% 43.9% 6.13
Announcer 1 5 1.1% 0.8% 5.0

Beginning / Middle / End thirds:

thirdlineswordswpmbeatsscenes
beginning [0–600s] 40 308 112 4 1
middle [600–1200s] 20 121 80 2 2
end [1200–1800s] 35 200 77 4 1

Iteration trajectory (this run, 2 iters)

Each meta iteration generates a fresh concept; iter scores aren't directly comparable as "improvement." The shaded row is the iter currently displayed.

iterconceptautorateraudio judge rulesseamsapplied
01 Measure Twice 8.95 7.00 8/10 2 0/0
02 Measure Twice 9.00 8.10 9/10 4 0/0

Critique summary

Composite 9.00/10. Top issues:
  • [tonal_shift_present] Land at least one moment in the final third where the laughter falls quiet. Cite a specific timestamp (M:SS or t=NNN form) in `analysis.standout_moments` so the rule can detect it. The 'vinegar in the sponge cake' beat.

Pattern failures (1)