← runs · all docs · view source on github

Exp 6 — Listener-persona disagreement analysis

N panel runs analyzed: 17 Distinct personas seen: 4

Per-persona base rates (across all runs)

persona runs mean notes/run mean severity top severity
radio_4_devotee 17 4.4 5.7 10
podcast_listener 17 4.3 5.8 10
audio_engineer 17 4.6 6.8 10
comedy_writer 17 4.4 5.6 9

Pairwise anchor overlap (within-run, severity >= 5)

Jaccard of target_anchor sets per pair of personas. 1.0 = perfect agreement, 0.0 = disjoint complaints.

persona A persona B mean Jaccard n runs
podcast_listener radio_4_devotee 0.07 17
comedy_writer radio_4_devotee 0.06 17
audio_engineer comedy_writer 0.03 17
audio_engineer radio_4_devotee 0.03 17
audio_engineer podcast_listener 0.01 17
comedy_writer podcast_listener 0.00 17

Overall mean pair-Jaccard: 0.03 (median 0.00, max 0.33)

Reading: if mean Jaccard < ~0.15, personas are largely independent — either complementary signal or noise. If mean Jaccard > ~0.40, personas converge on the same moments and the panel is acting as a 4-way confirmation.

Severity-score distribution per persona

persona sev≤3 sev 4-6 sev 7+ total notes
audio_engineer 0 35 44 79
comedy_writer 11 36 28 75
podcast_listener 11 32 30 73
radio_4_devotee 13 34 28 75